Well, 8 billion dollars per annul is spent with Rosetta stone software
subsidized money to recycle material that we have an over abundance of, and if your unclear as to subsidized money, it consists of taxes that the government takes from you to invest into businesses for the better interest of the people under the grounds that we ultimately don't know what's good for us. 8 billion dollars is a lot of money that could be used to pay scientists to research a more sensible approach to getting our society back on its feet. In the greater picture, recycling isn't getting us anywhere considering it wouldn't need to be recycled had we not made it in the first place. The average landfill dumb rate is between 50-60 dollars per ton, where as the average cost to recycle a ton of garbage is Rosetta Stone Indian Levev 1-3
150 dollars. that's 3 times the difference! I don't want to sound like I'm preaching landfills, more so the point I'm trying to reach is that if we didn't waste all these materials on items created created entirely for the purpose of convenience, we wouldn't have so much garbage to throw away. We don't need plastic bottles for soda or water, soda tastes just as good out of aluminum cans (which are actually the only thing that would be beneficial to recycle) and water filters provide the same crisp taste but save money and landfill space.The sum of my argument is this: It takes more money than it saves to recycle, its far more harmful for the environment in both the short and long run, and everything we recycle isn't running out any time soon. The real problem is people don't want to put forth any more effort than they have to or go without the convenience of crap like bottled water to take a couple steps towards the greater Rosetta Stone Greek Levev 1-3
good. I could write novel on ideas that would benefit far more than recycling with an 8 billion dollar fund.Written by Jake
没有评论:
发表评论